Comments on: The John 3:16 Conference- Richard Land on Unconditional Election http://toddongod.com/2008/11/09/the-john-316-conference-richard-land-on-unconditional-election/ Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:24:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Todd Burus http://toddongod.com/2008/11/09/the-john-316-conference-richard-land-on-unconditional-election/#comment-410 Todd Burus Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:26:48 +0000 http://forthetimethatispastsuffices.wordpress.com/?p=687#comment-410 Richard, I do not recall Land citing anyone besides CS Lewis for support on his view (and that wasn't necessarily an endorsement of his form of election, just a remark on the "eternal-now" perspective). This is fairly rogue, though it shares a lot in common with Geisler's approach while being a bit less Arminian in formulation. I think you will be disappointed, I definitely was. Richard,
I do not recall Land citing anyone besides CS Lewis for support on his view (and that wasn’t necessarily an endorsement of his form of election, just a remark on the “eternal-now” perspective). This is fairly rogue, though it shares a lot in common with Geisler’s approach while being a bit less Arminian in formulation. I think you will be disappointed, I definitely was.

]]> By: Richard Coords http://toddongod.com/2008/11/09/the-john-316-conference-richard-land-on-unconditional-election/#comment-407 Richard Coords Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:01:10 +0000 http://forthetimethatispastsuffices.wordpress.com/?p=687#comment-407 Hello Todd, I read your review of this presenter. I'm a 4-Point Arminian, and this is the topic that interested me the most. I just purchased the conference materials. Based upon your critique, I'm a little concerned about what I just purchased. I'm glad to support Dr. Vines, but if the essense of the presentation on Election was one of "must" vs. "will" be saved, in some kind of "Congruent Election," which I've never even heard of before, then I will be greatly disappointed. I'm hoping that he cited someone within Church history for this viewpoint, instead of endeavoring on some rouge perspective that no one has ever tackled before. Richard Hello Todd,

I read your review of this presenter. I’m a 4-Point Arminian, and this is the topic that interested me the most. I just purchased the conference materials. Based upon your critique, I’m a little concerned about what I just purchased. I’m glad to support Dr. Vines, but if the essense of the presentation on Election was one of “must” vs. “will” be saved, in some kind of “Congruent Election,” which I’ve never even heard of before, then I will be greatly disappointed. I’m hoping that he cited someone within Church history for this viewpoint, instead of endeavoring on some rouge perspective that no one has ever tackled before.

Richard

]]>